Haryana Election

Ignoring all the evidence and not providing or hiding all the data that the Election Commission of India (ECI) is legally bound to provide, including the 17C data, one can safely draw the conclusion that the election is rigged.

How EVM works and Why it should be banned to save the democracy?

Haryana election rigging, listen to the counting agent

Assembly Election Data

Seat Percentage

Bharatiya Janata Party - BJP seat percentage:53.333333333

Indian National Congress - INC seat percentage: 41.111111111

Vote share

Bharatiya Janata Party - BJP vote share: 39.94448315777956

Indian National Congress - INC seat percentage:39.09360404512759

Difference

Difference in seat percentage: 12.2222

Difference in vote share: 0.850879113

Hardly any election analysis has yet revealed such a significant seat share difference in comparison to the margin of vote percentage difference. The possibility of election rigging appears to be very evident.

Winner won majority

In 36 constituencies, the winner won the majority votes, while in 54 constituencies, the candidate who won did not get the majority votes.

Data

One can assume how terrible FPTP is. FPTP voting is most susceptible to EVM manipulation, and it's also terrible because it hardly considers what the majority of voters want. Moreover, it's antidemocratic because in 60% of constituencies, the representative didn't receive the majority of votes or the majority mandate from the people.

We need to start considering a more fair voting system, such as Approval Voting, that eliminates vote splitting.