Upholding Justice: The Role of Judges in Integrating Scientific Evidence and Constitutional Morality
In the realm of jurisprudence, judges hold an esteemed responsibility of upholding justice, protecting fundamental rights, and ensuring equality for all individuals. Central to this responsibility is the imperative for judges to base their judgments on objective criteria, free from personal biases and opinions.
Fundamental rights, enshrined in constitutions around the world, serve as the bedrock of a just and equitable society. These rights encompass a wide array of liberties, including freedom of speech, the right to privacy, and equality before the law. It is the duty of judges to safeguard these rights zealously, employing a balanced approach that respects both individual freedoms and societal interests.
In the pursuit of justice, scientific evidence plays a pivotal role. Whether in criminal trials, environmental disputes, or matters of public health, scientific findings can provide crucial insights that inform legal proceedings. From DNA analysis to climate change research, the integration of scientific evidence enables judges to make well-informed decisions grounded in empirical data rather than conjecture or speculation.
Moreover, in a world grappling with complex ethical dilemmas and social injustices, the concept of constitutional morality emerges as a guiding principle for judicial interpretation. Constitutional morality refers to an adherence to the spirit and values enshrined in the constitution, transcending mere legal formalism. It encompasses notions of justice, fairness, and human dignity, serving as a compass to navigate the intricacies of legal disputes.
However, the effective integration of scientific evidence and constitutional morality into judicial decisions requires a steadfast commitment to impartiality and objectivity. Judges must remain vigilant against the influence of personal biases and ideological predispositions that may cloud their judgment. The judiciary's credibility hinges on its ability to dispense justice without fear or favor, ensuring that all individuals are treated equitably before the law.
Furthermore, judicial education and training programs play a vital role in equipping judges with the requisite knowledge and skills to grapple with complex scientific concepts and constitutional principles. Continuing education initiatives focused on scientific literacy and constitutional jurisprudence can empower judges to adjudicate cases effectively, safeguarding fundamental rights while promoting societal welfare.
In addition to judicial competence, transparency and accountability mechanisms are essential to uphold the integrity of the judiciary. Public scrutiny and oversight serve as checks against judicial misconduct or partiality, fostering trust and confidence in the legal system.
Just learning law books by judges is not enough.
The Crucial Role of Interdisciplinary Knowledge in Judicial Decision Making
Introduction
Judges play a pivotal role in the administration of justice. Their decisions have far-reaching consequences, not only for the parties involved in a particular case but also for society as a whole. It is, therefore, essential that judges are equipped with the necessary knowledge and skills to make informed, fair, and just decisions. While a thorough understanding of the law is undoubtedly essential, it is increasingly evident that judges also need to be well-versed in interdisciplinary knowledge to navigate the complexities of modern society effectively.
The Importance of Interdisciplinary Knowledge in Judicial Decision Making
In today's fast-paced, technologically advanced world, the issues that come before the courts are becoming increasingly complex. Many of these issues require an understanding of scientific principles, methods, and findings to be properly evaluated and resolved. For example, cases involving environmental pollution, medical malpractice, or intellectual property disputes often hinge on scientific evidence.
As a result, judges must be able to understand and evaluate this evidence effectively. This requires a solid foundation in the relevant scientific disciplines, such as physics, chemistry, biology, and molecular biology. A judge who lacks this knowledge may struggle to grasp the implications of scientific evidence, leading to flawed decisions that fail to provide justice for the parties involved.
Moreover, an understanding of scientific methods and experimentation is crucial for evaluating the credibility of scientific evidence. Judges must be able to assess whether the methods used to generate the evidence were reliable, valid, and free from bias. Without this knowledge, judges may inadvertently admit unreliable or invalid evidence, which can lead to miscarriages of justice.
The Role of Neuroscience and Logical Fallacies in Judicial Decision Making
Another area in which interdisciplinary knowledge can be invaluable for judges is neuroscience. A growing body of research in this field has shed light on the workings of the human brain, including how it processes information, makes decisions, and forms beliefs. This knowledge can help judges to better understand the cognitive biases and heuristics that may influence their decision-making processes.
Questions like 'Does free will exist?' or 'What makes a criminal commit a crime?' can be answered by shedding light on neuroscience, molecular biology, and evolution.
Neuroscientific research has revealed that our thoughts and actions are the result of complex neural processes that occur within the brain. For instance, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have shown that different regions of the brain are activated when we make decisions, suggesting that our choices are not entirely arbitrary but rather influenced by our neural architecture.
Moreover, molecular biology research has identified specific genes and proteins that play a role in decision-making processes. For example, certain genetic mutations have been linked to impulsive behavior, indicating that our genetic makeup can influence our choices.
For example, judges may be susceptible to the confirmation bias, which is the tendency to seek out and interpret information in a way that confirms their existing beliefs. By understanding the cognitive mechanisms underlying this bias, judges can take steps to mitigate its influence on their decision making.
Similarly, an understanding of logical fallacies can help judges to identify and avoid common errors in reasoning that can lead to flawed decisions. For instance, the ad hominem fallacy involves attacking the person making an argument rather than the argument itself. By recognizing this fallacy, judges can ensure that their decisions are based on the merits of the case, rather than personal biases or prejudices.
The Benefits of Interdisciplinary Knowledge for Judicial Decision Making
The benefits of interdisciplinary knowledge for judges are manifold. First and foremost, it enables judges to make more informed, evidence-based decisions that are grounded in a thorough understanding of the issues at hand. This, in turn, can lead to more just and equitable outcomes for the parties involved in a case.
Moreover, an interdisciplinary approach to judicial decision making can help to bridge the gap between law and science, fostering greater collaboration and cooperation between these two fields. This can lead to the development of new legal frameworks and policies that are better suited to addressing the complex challenges of the modern world.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while a solid understanding of the law is essential for judges, it is not enough to ensure just and fair decisions. Judges must also be well-versed in interdisciplinary knowledge, including physics, chemistry, biology, molecular biology, neuroscience, scientific methods, experimentation, logical fallacies, and paradoxes. By acquiring this knowledge, judges can better navigate the complexities of modern society, making more informed, evidence-based decisions that provide better social justice for all.
Is protecting climate recognized as a fundamental right, or is it merely serving corporate profit?
Great Indian Bustard Ardeotis nigriceps is a critically endangered species
People have fundamental right to be free from impact of climate change: Supreme Court The top court made these remarks while lifting the blanket ban it had put on the laying of over-the-ground power lines in areas frequented by the bird commonly known as the Great Indian Bustard (GIB).
The Supreme Court says that people have the right to be free from the adverse effects of climate change. Is this truly the case, or is the judgment primarily aimed at saving corporate costs?
What is the extent of the Great Indian Bustard's habitat? What is the cost of installing underground wires? Additionally, what are the advantages and disadvantages of underground wires, and what are the long-term costs associated with them?
These are questions that need to be addressed.
Undergrounding
In civil engineering, undergrounding is the replacement of overhead cables providing electrical power or telecommunications, with underground cables. It helps in wildfire prevention and in making the power lines less susceptible to outages during high winds, thunderstorms or heavy snow or ice storms. An added benefit of undergrounding is the aesthetic quality of the landscape without the powerlines. Undergrounding can increase the capital cost of electric power transmission and distribution but may decrease operating costs over the lifetime of the cables.
Underground cables pose no hazard to low-flying aircraft or to wildlife.
Above-ground lines cost around $10 per 1-foot (0.30 m) and underground lines cost in the range of $20 to $40 per 1-foot (0.30 m). In highly urbanized areas, the cost of underground transmission can be 10–14 times as expensive as overhead. However, these calculations may neglect the cost of power interruptions.
The lifetime cost difference is smaller for lower-voltage distribution networks, on the range of 12-28% higher than overhead lines of equivalent voltage.
Advantages and disadvantages of Undergrounding
How do the birds die?
Aerial insulated cables
There are also above ground insulated cables that can protect birds from electroculation
Development and installation of a 69 kV aerial cable system
The Silent Crisis: Noise Pollution, Health Impact, and Fascism's Exploitation of Religious Noise Pollution
Introduction
In the modern world, noise pollution has emerged as a significant environmental threat, often overlooked but with far-reaching implications on public health, well-being, and societal cohesion. While the dangers of noise pollution are well-documented, its insidious nature makes it challenging to address effectively. Furthermore, in some cases, noise pollution has been deliberately exploited by fascist governments to polarize societies along religious lines, further exacerbating the negative consequences of this silent crisis.
The Impact of Noise Pollution on Health
Noise pollution is defined as any unwanted or disturbing sound that affects the quality of life and health of humans and other living organisms. It is a pervasive problem in urban areas, where the cacophony of traffic, construction, and industrial activities creates an unrelenting assault on the senses. The effects of noise pollution on human health are manifold, ranging from mild annoyance to severe physical and psychological disorders.
One of the most common health impacts of noise pollution is hearing loss. Prolonged exposure to loud noise can cause irreversible damage to the delicate hair cells in the inner ear, leading to permanent hearing impairment. In addition to hearing loss, noise pollution has been linked to sleep disturbances, cardiovascular issues, and increased stress levels.
Chronic exposure to noise pollution can also lead to cognitive impairments, particularly in children. Studies have shown that children living in noisy environments tend to have lower reading comprehension, memory retention, and problem-solving abilities compared to their peers in quieter neighborhoods. This has significant implications for educational attainment and overall life outcomes.
The Exploitation of Religious Noise Pollution by Fascist Governments
In some instances, noise pollution has been deliberately weaponized by fascist governments to sow discord and polarize societies along religious lines. This is particularly evident in countries where religious minorities are subjected to targeted noise pollution as a form of psychological warfare.
For example, in India, Hindu nationalist groups have been accused of using loudspeakers to blast religious songs and chants outside mosques during Muslim prayer times, creating a cacophony that makes it difficult for worshippers to concentrate. This deliberate noise pollution is a form of harassment designed to intimidate and marginalize religious minorities, fueling tensions and deepening societal divisions.
As the festival of Ram Navami approaches, concerns arise regarding the potential misuse of loudspeakers by political factions seeking to exploit this religious occasion for their own gain. Rather than promoting peaceful celebrations and fostering spiritual growth, the excessive use of loudspeakers can lead to noise pollution, disrupting the lives of local residents and exacerbating tensions within communities. It is crucial for governments and religious organizations to prioritize the well-being of citizens and the environment, promoting responsible use of loudspeakers and ensuring that festivals remain a time for unity, harmony, and spiritual reflection. By doing so, we can work together to combat the negative effects of noise pollution and preserve the true essence of religious celebrations.
In light of the upcoming Ram Navami celebrations, it is imperative that we reconsider the role of loudspeakers in these festivities. Instead of allowing them to become a tool for political posturing and noise pollution, we should strive for a more introspective and spiritual approach to the occasion. By focusing on the actual values of Lord Ram and promoting personal growth and reflection, we can ensure that the true spirit of Ram Navami is preserved.
Peace, silence and prayer
Throughout the Ramayana, Lord Ram consistently upholds principles of peace, compassion, and justice. He adheres to his duty as a prince and later as an exiled king with utmost integrity, despite facing numerous trials and tribulations. He exemplifies forgiveness, even towards those who wrong him, such as his stepmother Kaikeyi and the demon king Ravana. In the end, his victory over Ravana is not just a triumph of physical strength but also of righteousness and truth.
In Hindu philosophy, the concept of peace (shanti) is highly valued. It is believed that inner peace leads to harmony with the external world. Prayer, meditation, and religious rituals are often seen as means to attain this inner peace, enabling individuals to lead fulfilling and virtuous lives.
Noise and Ram Navami
The celebration of Ram Navami is often accompanied by such loud noise that people can even suffer heart attacks.
We have shifted prayer and spirituality to noise pollution during Ram Navami celebrations, and it has become a political tool to garner voters through polarization and the promotion of Hindu supremacy.
Conclusion
Noise pollution is a silent crisis that demands greater attention from policymakers, public health experts, and society at large. Its impact on human health and well-being is significant and far-reaching, affecting not only individuals but also entire communities and societies.
Moreover, the exploitation of religious noise pollution by fascist governments to polarize societies along religious lines is a particularly egregious form of this silent crisis. It is essential that we recognize the dangers of noise pollution and take concrete steps to mitigate its impact on our lives and the world around us. This includes implementing effective noise reduction strategies, raising public awareness about the dangers of noise pollution, and promoting interfaith dialogue and understanding to counter the divisive effects of religious noise pollution.
The story of Prahlada and Holika teaches us that good will always triumph over evil
The story of Prahlada and Holika teaches us that good will always triumph over evil, and that devotion and faith can overcome even the most powerful adversaries. This is a lesson that we can apply to our modern-day struggles, especially in the political arena.
One of the most pressing issues facing our democracy today is the prevalence of dictatorship and the manipulation of the voting process. In many countries, including India, the use of electronic voting machines (EVMs) has raised concerns about the accuracy and integrity of election results. The lack of transparency in the counting and tabulation of votes has led to widespread doubts about the legitimacy of election outcomes.
This is where we can draw inspiration from the story of Prahlada. Like Prahlada, who remained steadfast in his devotion to Vishnu despite the threats of his evil father, we must also remain steadfast in our commitment to democracy and the rule of law. We must not allow the forces of dictatorship and corruption to undermine our democratic institutions, and we must demand transparency and accountability in our electoral processes.
One way to achieve this is to ban the use of electronic voting machines and return to a paper-based system of voting. While EVMs were initially introduced to improve the speed and efficiency of vote counting, their use has been marred by allegations of tampering and fraud. By returning to a paper-based system, we can ensure that every vote is counted and that the results accurately reflect the will of the people.
In addition to banning EVMs, we must also work to end dictatorship and promote democratic values. This means standing up to authoritarian leaders who seek to consolidate power and silence dissent. It means supporting civil society organizations and independent media that hold our leaders accountable and promote transparency and accountability. And it means educating our citizens about the importance of voting and the role they play in shaping our democracy.
The fascist government’s unabated manipulation of legal systems, scapegoating, and discrimination have reached alarming levels. It has weakened or abolished democratic institutions and relentlessly suppressed opposition, arresting anyone who dares to dissent. In these trying times, we must draw inspiration from the story of Prahlada, who remained steadfast and unmoved by the relentless efforts of Hiranyakashipu to destroy him. Prahlada’s unwavering faith and devotion serve as a beacon of hope, reminding us of the power of perseverance in the face of adversity. We must emulate Prahlada’s resilience and stand firm in our commitment to democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. By working together and supporting each other, we can overcome the challenges posed by authoritarian regimes and create a society that values justice, equality, and freedom for all.
‘Billionaire Raj’ Is Pushing India Toward Autocracy
The super-rich have opened their wallets to Modi, and income inequality has soared over the past decade. With an election coming, ordinary voters need to ask, ‘What’s in it for us?’
As we celebrate Holi and the triumph of good over evil, let us remember the lessons of Prahlada and use them to guide our actions in the fight for democracy and justice. By standing up to dictatorship and demanding transparency and accountability in our electoral processes, we can ensure that our voices are heard and our votes are counted. Let us work together to create a brighter future for ourselves and for generations to come.
The meat politics in India
Meat eating by Early Humans
The diet of the earliest hominins was probably somewhat similar to the diet of modern chimpanzees: omnivorous, including large quantities of fruit, leaves, flowers, bark, insects and meat.
Eating meat drove the evolution of our big, powerful brain
https://www.nasw.org/article/eating-meat-drove-evolution-our-big-powerful-brain
The modern human brain is two to three times larger than that of our closest relatives, chimpanzees. But to supply energy to such metabolically demanding tissue, a distinct trade-off in energy allocation had to evolve.
In 1992, researchers proposed that this gradual expansion of the ancestral brain was made possible by switching from a vegetative diet to a meat-rich, fat-rich diet. As meat became a dietary staple, the gut shortened, and the brain no longer needed to rely on fuel from muscle and fat stores in the body. A shorter gut requires a great deal less energy than the lengthy gut of herbivores. Drawing on the extra energy resources from a fatty diet, and a shorter gut, the brain could afford to grow.
How a vegan diet could affect your intelligence
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200127-how-a-vegan-diet-could-affect-your-intelligence
There are several important brain nutrients that simply do not exist in plants or fungi
Surprisingly, the children who were given the soup containing meat each day seemed to have a significant edge. By the end of the study, they outperformed all the other children on a test for non-verbal reasoning. Along with the children who received soup with added oil, they also did the best on a test of arithmetic ability. Of course, more research is needed to verify if this effect is real, and if it would also apply to adults in developed countries, too. But it does raise intriguing questions about whether veganism could be holding some people back.
Meat and climate change
https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/climate-issues/food
Which foods cause the most greenhouse gas emissions?
Meat production often requires extensive grasslands, which is often created by cutting down trees, releasing carbon dioxide stored in forests.
The Cultural Significance of Meat Consumption
Meat consumption is not just a biological necessity; it is also an essential part of many cultural practices. In many societies, meat is a symbol of wealth, power, and status. For instance, in many African cultures, meat is considered a delicacy and is served during special occasions and ceremonies. Similarly, in many Indigenous cultures, hunting and meat consumption are integral to their cultural identity and way of life.
Therefore, the cultural significance of meat consumption cannot be ignored. Attempts to impose vegetarianism or veganism on people who have deep-rooted cultural connections to meat consumption can be seen as a form of cultural imperialism. Instead, we should focus on promoting responsible meat consumption that takes into account the cultural practices and beliefs of different communities.
The Importance of Personal Choice
The decision to consume meat or abstain from it is a deeply personal one that should be based on individual preferences, beliefs, and cultural practices. Imposing vegetarianism or veganism on people based on religious grounds can be seen as a form of cultural imperialism that undermines the agency of individuals to make their own choices. Moreover, it can lead to a sense of alienation and exclusion among those who do not adhere to the prescribed dietary practices.
Religious indoctrination to quit meat can also lead to conflicts within families and communities, especially in cultures where meat consumption is an essential part of social and cultural practices. For instance, in many Hindu households, meat is served during special occasions and festivals, and abstaining from it can be seen as a rejection of cultural traditions and practices.
Conclusion
The debate surrounding meat politics has become increasingly polarized, with advocates for vegetarianism and veganism on one side and those who support responsible meat consumption on the other. While it is essential to consider the environmental impact of meat production and consumption, it is equally important to recognize the historical, evolutionary, and health benefits of meat consumption.
Dictatorship
Mother of Democracy
Why are you guys so anti dictators?
Electoral Bond
SBI with normal customers vs. Electoral Bond purchasers
News
Nazee News
Sarcasm Describing the Current State of Godi Media
So, why does a currency get devalued? It's about more printing of money for unproductive purposes, such as funding government allies, like writing off corporate loans.
Zimbabwe and Hyperinflation: Who Wants to Be a Trillionaire?
Explanation of Inflation and quantity theory of Money
https://mru.org/courses/principles-economics-macroeconomics/zimbabwe-currency-inflation
Media Ownership
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_news_media_ownership_in_India
Elon on twitter censorship
According to Elon Musk's X statement, "We disagree with these actions and maintain that freedom of expression should extend to these posts and political speech in general." It seems that Elon Musk, as the new owner of Twitter, is advocating for more freedom of expression on the platform.
In an unexpected twist of fate, tech mogul Elon Musk has become the unlikely champion of free speech, vigorously defending the First Amendment rights of Twitter users across the globe. His unwavering dedication to ensuring that every voice is heard, no matter how unpopular or dissenting, has earned him widespread praise and admiration.
However, behind the scenes, a shocking truth has emerged: Elon disagrees with nothing, otherwise, he would have fought the legal battle in court. He is, in fact, another fascist, far-right clown billionaire attempting to curb freedom of speech. That was the sole reason for taking over Twitter.
"Ironically, Musk's commitment to free speech is so strong that he has filed a lawsuit against himself to prove his devotion to the cause," said an anonymous source within Musk's inner circle. "He truly believes that the best way to protect free speech is to take over the world's most influential social media platform and manipulate it to his own liking."
Doesn't our constitution provide freedom of speech as a fundamental right? Absolutely, but it seems that Musk's understanding of this principle is a bit skewed. As an easy win in courts, one might expect him to take a stand for the First Amendment. However, Musk will never do that. Instead, he prefers to wield his power and influence to shape the discourse to his own ends, all while cloaked in the guise of a champion of free speech.
As the saying goes, "Absolute power corrupts absolutely." In this case, it appears that Elon Musk's absolute power over Twitter has led him to become the very thing he claims to be fighting against: a threat to freedom of speech.
PM's Rajasthan Speech Fact Checked
Population Jihad Fact or Hype
Palki Sharma Three Arguments
Palki Sharma presents three arguments on development.
Financial Inclusion
According to her, paying through UPI is considered development. However, it's actually a dangerous move. It's about relinquishing control of your finances to the government, enabling them to seize your account anytime there's protest or dissent. Thousands of bank accounts have already been blocked by the government, including those of the Congress Party.
Cash is still very easy to use, but the government has undermined the cash system through measures such as demonetization, which has adversely affected the livelihoods of millions
Can poor and middle-class people bear the burden of maintaining a minimum balance?
Banks collected over Rs21,00 Cr for breaching minimum balance norm
Internet or digital penetration
While during Congress's tenure, there were more than 12 service providers, under the new Modi government, the number has dwindled to two or three. None of them offer optimal service; Airtel is somewhat better, but Jio is worse. The government seems to prioritize corporate profits and foster monopolies. As for digital penetration, the credit should be attributed to cheaper mobiles from China rather than Modi's India.
Airport Traffic
Is airport traffic a good thing? In a country where 90% of the population belongs to the middle class, air travel is hardly accessible. Moreover, it's one of the biggest contributors to pollution, especially in the era of climate change. During summer, heat waves last for two months, with temperatures exceeding 40 degrees Celsius. What we truly need is investment in public transport, which is currently lacking. Instead, Modi's focus seems to be on building roads for a car-centric system, leading to pollution and traffic congestion that harm our ecosystem.
Fake journalist tries to control the stories, true journalist shows facts.
"When you set the NARRATIVE, and when you are in control of the STORY, you can project yourself as a GOOD BOY, inspite of all the WRONG you did, That's where the MEDIA comes in"
-Palki SHARMA
"This is how you debunk the false narrative, with NUMBERS & FACTS"
-Prashant Bhushan
Robin Hood economics Article fact check
Tavleen Singh's article argues against what she perceives as Rahul Gandhi's inclination towards taxing the rich and redistributing wealth, advocating instead for policies that encourage wealth creation. However, her arguments overlook the detrimental effects of monopolies on markets and society. Here's a critique of her points:
-
Misrepresentation of Wealth Creation: While entrepreneurship and innovation are indeed drivers of economic growth, she overlooks how monopolies distort this process. Monopolies hinder competition and innovation by restricting entry into the market, stifling potential wealth creation from smaller players.
-
Neglect of Monopoly Power: Singh fails to acknowledge the negative implications of monopoly power. Take for example pharmaceutical patents. By granting exclusive rights to produce and sell certain drugs, monopolies like GlaxoSmithKline can inflate prices significantly above production costs. This artificially high pricing limits access to essential medicines, leading to adverse health outcomes for those unable to afford them. Under the Congress government, we had about 12 internet service providers, but now we have just two or three.
The mystery of the Adani coal imports that quietly doubled in value
-
Ignoring Economic Inequality: Singh's focus on preserving wealth creation without addressing the widening wealth gap overlooks a critical aspect of economic prosperity. Monopolies exacerbate inequality by concentrating wealth and power in the hands of a few, rather than fostering broad-based economic growth that benefits society as a whole.
-
Monopolies provide taxes:Singh's argument that Adani and Ambani bring in more taxes is also incorrect. Decentralized systems without monopolies tend to collect more taxes than monopolies. Monopolies discourage entrepreneurship, and unchecked monopolistic practices also pose significant threats to economic freedom and prosperity.
-
Lack of Regulatory Consideration: Singh's argument against taxation and wealth redistribution overlooks the role of government regulation in curbing monopolistic behaviors. Effective regulation can promote competition, innovation, and equitable wealth distribution, thereby fostering a more dynamic and inclusive economy. Effective regulation also decreases negative externalities, especially in times of rampant pollution that impacts our health and leads to climate catastrophe.
Overall, while Singh advocates for policies that promote wealth creation, her arguments fail to address the detrimental effects of monopolies on market competition, economic inequality, and societal welfare. A more nuanced approach that acknowledges the need for both entrepreneurship and effective regulation is essential for fostering sustainable and inclusive economic growth.
Wealth creation requires better wealth distribution and a free market without monopolies, rather than handing over everything to a few companies. The current government is running on rampant loans rather than focusing on wealth creation. The Congress government (Or the past UPA coalition government) has been better at achieving this than the current government. An economist as a Prime Minister is far better than an uneducated Prime Minister.
Tavleen Singh Article
INDIANEXPRESS.COM APRIL 28, 2024
Fifth COLUMN
TAVLEEN SINGH Twitter @tavleen singh
Robin Hood economics
JUST BEFORE sitting down to write this piece, I spotted Rahul Gandhi's latest campaign video on social media. The video began with a poster of Gautam Adani's face on which the word 'BAN' was written. After this Rahul appeared and declared in an angry voice that he promised to give farmers, workers, and the poor as much money as 'Modi has given Adani'. This is only one of many campaign videos in which the inheritor of the Nehru-Gandhi legacy speaks of how when a Congress government comes to power, it will take money from the rich and distribute it to the poor. It is time to remind the man who seeks to unseat Modi in this general election that it is not his personal wealth that he is threatening to hand out. It is taxpayers' money. It is not just the money of men like Adani and Ambani, but money given in taxes by all of us who pay taxes. What I find disturbing about Rahul's rants against rich Indians is his unconcealed contempt for those who create wealth. The private sector has survived and thrived despite socialist policies like the license raj, de- spite debilitating taxation. It deserves to be respected and not disdained. The wealth that is owned by men like Adani has not been 'given' to them by Modi or any other politician. It is wealth that they have created for the country, some of which is already being paid to the govern- ment in taxes. Why is this so hard for Rahul Gandhi to understand?
The Congress Party has repeatedly in- dicated that if it comes to power it has plans to introduce crippling new taxes on rich people. Sam Pitroda, famous for dam- aging the Congress Party's 'secularism' in the last general election, damaged its economic philosophy last week by announcing that it was time to bring back an inheritance tax. Congress spokesmen quickly distanced the party from Pitroda's statement, but redistribution of wealth Robin Hood style is something that Rahul Gandhi has talked about often since the campaign for this election began. It is time for him to be reminded of what India looked like when taxes on the rich were so insane in his Granny's time that businessmen were ordered to pay 97% of their earnings as tax. The result was that not only was the private sector nearly de- stroyed but government itself had no money to distribute to the poor. It was a general redistribution of poverty that re- sulted. India has taken decades to recover and to prosper enough for a middle class to emerge and for a hesitant celebration of prosperity to begin. In the past ten years it is to Modi's credit that he has continued with economic policies that encourage the creation of wealth. In the opinion of those who would like to see the Indian economy really soar, he has not done enough to end socialism. He needs to do much more to totally rid us of an economic ideology that kept India mired in poverty.
Robin Hood Rahul also announced last week that he was so committed to order- ing a caste census that he has made it his life's mission. There can be compromises in politics, he said, but no compromises when you make something your life': mission. He has clarified more than once that the purpose of this census is to en able the redistribution of wealth. So castes that fall into the poorest categor will be the first to benefit. This is revers casteism at a time when the divisions caste in urban India have blurred. In vilages higher caste bigots may choose n to eat at the same table as those they com sider lower than them, but this is not po sible in a city restaurant.
Monopoly educational video
Monopoly. It's not just a game. In this video we'll talk about how a firm uses market power to maximize profit. We'll begin with a controversial example.
This is the AIDS virus. Worldwide, it has killed more than 36 million people. In the United States, however, AIDS is no longer the death sentence that it once was. Beginning in the mid-1990s, death rates from AIDS began to fall dramatically with the introduction of new drugs such as Combivir. These new drugs are great, but they're expensive, and they're expensive not because it costs a lot to manufacture these drugs. The per-pill costs of production are actually quite low. Instead, these drugs are expensive because they're the subject matter of this chapter -- Monopoly.
GlaxoSmithKline, or GSK, owns the patent on Combivir and that means that it has the right to exclude competitors. Only GSK can legally sell Combivir. The patent gives GSK a monopoly, or more generally we say it gives them market power. Market power is the power to raise price above marginal cost without fear that other firms will enter the market. Now how do we know the price is above marginal cost? Here's a simple test -- in the United States, Combivir costs around $12 to $13 per pill. India, however, does not recognize the patent on Combivir. So in India, there are many producers of Combivir who sell in a competitive market. As we know, in a competitive market, price will fall to marginal cost and in India the price of Combivir is about 50 cents per pill. Thus, in the United States, the price of Combivir is about 25 times higher than the marginal cost.
Let's say a few words about the sources of market power. The basic idea is that a firm has market power when it's selling a unique good and there are barriers to entry, forces which prevent competitors from entering the market. Barriers to entry could include patents, as we've already discussed. There may also be other government regulations creating barriers to entry, such as exclusive licenses. Economies of scale can mean that a single big firm can sell at lower cost than any of many small firms, making it difficult to establish a competitive market even with free entry. Exclusive access to an important input.
Diamonds, for example, are found in only a few places in the world. If you control a number of these diamond mines, you can monopolize the market for diamonds, where you will have market power in the market for diamonds. Technological innovations can give a firm temporary market power. A firm with knowledge or abilities that other firms don't yet have will have some market power, for example. Now we'll say a little bit more about these later. What we want to do now is to focus on how a firm with market power chooses to set its price. What is the profit maximizing price?
Print Media vs Mainstream TV Media: Which one provides more authentic news that matters to the people?
Print Media: Funding and Authenticity
Print media in India, such as newspapers and magazines, rely primarily on reader subscriptions for funding. This means that the news provided by print media is mostly funded by users rather than corporations or advertisers. As a result, print media tends to focus on delivering authentic news that matters to the people, as they are directly accountable to their readers.
In recent years, print media has played a significant role in reporting news that mainstream TV media has largely ignored. For example, print media provided detailed news coverage of the electoral bonds scam, which involved the alleged misuse of funds by political parties. Similarly, print media reported extensively on the "BJP washing machine" scandal, highlighting how 25 opposition leaders facing corruption charges crossed over to the BJP, with 23 of them getting a reprieve.
Do check out which print media is delivering biased news, along with its owner, funding, and advertisements. You can quickly unsubscribe from biased print media and shift to another.
Mainstream TV Media: Funding and Influence
Mainstream TV media in India, on the other hand, is funded mostly by advertisers and corporations. This has raised concerns about the influence of these entities on the news reporting process. Many argue that mainstream TV media tends to prioritize sensationalism and entertainment over providing in-depth, authentic news coverage.
Moreover, mainstream TV media comes with minimal TV package options, and users cannot unsubscribe news channels to save a substantial amount of money. This has led to a situation where people are forced to consume news from TV channels that may not provide authentic and unbiased information.
How can we tackle mainstream media?
The Supreme Court stated, "Don't watch if you don't like: Supreme Court on pleas to regulate TV news channels." However, the government is forcing us to pay for these channels through the minimum TV package. To address this issue, TV news channels should be excluded from the minimum package, allowing users to choose which channels they pay for. Why should we pay for propaganda channels? A similar Public Interest Litigation (PIL) should be submitted before the court to advocate for this change.
Conclusion
While a statistical analysis of news coverage in both print and TV media would provide more concrete evidence, the anecdotal evidence presented in this article suggests that print media may indeed be a better source for authentic news in India. As citizens, it is essential to support and encourage the growth of independent, authentic news sources to ensure a well-informed and engaged society.
How to Identify Biased Media and Make Informed Choices
In an era where information inundates us from all directions, discerning truth from bias has become a crucial skill. Print media, with its longstanding tradition of journalism, remains a significant source of news for many. However, not all publications adhere to unbiased reporting. Recognizing biased print media, understanding its ownership, funding sources, and advertisements can empower readers to make informed choices about where they get their news.
Identifying Bias
Recognizing biased reporting requires a critical eye and an understanding of journalistic standards. Biased reporting often manifests in several ways:
-
Selective Reporting: Biased media may cherry-pick facts or only present one side of a story while ignoring alternative perspectives.
-
Loaded Language: Pay attention to the language used in headlines and articles. Biased publications often employ emotionally charged language to sway readers' opinions.
-
Omission of Context: Context is crucial in understanding news stories. Biased media may omit relevant information that contradicts their narrative.
-
Opinion Disguised as Fact: Be wary of opinion pieces masquerading as news. While opinion pieces have their place, they should be clearly labeled as such.
Investigating Ownership and Funding
Understanding the ownership and funding behind a publication can provide valuable insights into potential biases. Here's what to look for:
-
Owner Background: Research the individuals or entities that own the publication. Are they affiliated with any political parties, advocacy groups, or corporations that could influence editorial decisions?
-
Corporate Ownership: Many media outlets are part of larger conglomerates with diverse business interests. Consider how these interests might influence the publication's reporting.
-
Funding Sources: Examine where the publication's revenue comes from. Are they heavily reliant on advertising from specific industries or interest groups? Such dependencies can influence editorial content.
Analyzing Advertisements
Advertisements can offer clues about a publication's target audience and potential biases:
-
Advertiser Profiles: Take note of the types of products or services advertised in the publication. Are there recurring themes or industries represented? This can shed light on the publication's target demographic and potential biases.
-
Sponsored Content: Be cautious of sponsored articles that may blur the lines between editorial content and advertising. While labeled as advertisements, they can still influence readers' perceptions.
Making Informed Choices
Armed with this knowledge, readers can make informed decisions about which print media to support:
-
Diversify Your Sources: Consume news from a variety of sources with differing perspectives. This helps mitigate the risk of echo chambers and provides a more comprehensive understanding of complex issues.
-
Fact-Check: Verify information from multiple reputable sources before accepting it as truth. Fact-checking organizations can help separate fact from fiction.
-
Be Skeptical: Approach news consumption with a healthy dose of skepticism. Question narratives presented by media outlets and seek out evidence to support claims.
-
Hold Media Accountable: Provide feedback to publications when you identify biased reporting or misinformation. Holding media accountable encourages journalistic integrity and transparency.
By staying vigilant and critical of the media we consume, we can navigate the landscape of print media more effectively and ensure that our sources of news are reliable and trustworthy.
Money is Not the Key to Winning an Election: The Importance of Authentic Communication, Community Engagement, and Vision
Introduction
The narrative that money is the defining factor in winning an election is deeply ingrained in our society. However, this belief often overlooks the critical role of authentic communication, community engagement, and vision in connecting with voters and winning their support. As independent candidates or political newcomers, it's crucial to understand how these factors can help you overcome the challenges of vote buying and the first-past-the-post (FPTP) system.
The Myth of Money in Elections
While it's true that money plays a role in elections, it is not the sole determining factor. In fact, numerous examples of candidates with limited financial resources but strong grassroots support and compelling messages have proven that money is not a necessary factor to win an election.
The Power of Authentic Communication
Authentic communication is the cornerstone of any successful political campaign. It involves being genuine, transparent, and relatable to voters. By establishing trust and demonstrating a deep understanding of the issues that matter most to the community, candidates can connect with voters on a personal level. This connection is often more powerful than any amount of money spent on advertising or campaign materials.
Community Engagement and Networking
Engaging with the community is another critical aspect of a winning election campaign. This involves attending local events, volunteering, and building relationships with local organizations, businesses, and residents. By actively participating in the community, candidates can demonstrate their commitment to the area and establish a strong network of supporters who can help spread their message.
Vision and a Practical Manifesto to Deliver
A compelling vision for the future is another essential element of a successful election campaign. This vision should outline the candidate's goals and priorities for the community, demonstrating their understanding of the issues at hand and their commitment to finding practical solutions. A well-crafted manifesto can help candidates differentiate themselves from their opponents and provide voters with a clear understanding of what they can expect if the candidate is elected.
To create a practical manifesto, candidates should conduct thorough research on the issues facing their community and consult with local experts and stakeholders to develop feasible solutions. By presenting a realistic plan of action, candidates can demonstrate their competence and commitment to making a positive impact on the lives of their constituents.
Moreover, it's crucial for candidates to communicate their vision and manifesto effectively. This can be achieved through various channels, such as public forums, social media, and one-on-one conversations with voters. By consistently sharing their vision and manifesto, candidates can reinforce their message and inspire voters to support their campaign.
In summary, a compelling vision and a practical manifesto to deliver are essential components of a successful election campaign. By focusing on these factors, candidates can demonstrate their commitment to the community, differentiate themselves from their opponents, and inspire voters to support their campaign.
Understanding the FPTP System and Vote Splitting
To maximize their chances of winning, independent candidates must also understand the first-past-the-post (FPTP) system and the potential impact of vote splitting. In FPTP, the candidate with the most votes wins, even if they do not secure a majority. This can lead to vote splitting, where multiple candidates from the same party or ideology divide the vote, allowing a less popular candidate to win.
To overcome this challenge, independent candidates should focus on building a diverse coalition of supporters, reaching out to voters who may not typically vote for their party or ideology. By appealing to a wider range of voters, candidates can increase their chances of securing the most votes and winning the election.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while money can certainly help a candidate's chances of winning an election, it is not the sole determining factor. Authentic communication, community engagement, and a compelling vision for the future can help independent candidates overcome the challenges of vote buying and the FPTP system. By focusing on these factors, candidates can build a strong foundation of support and increase their chances of winning the election.
4 departments of brainwashing
Department No. 1: Racial or Religious Pride.
To mislead the laypeople, hateful messages will not work right from the start. The initial messages will focus on pride so that you get trapped in their trap.
You will be told that you should be proud of your race.
"Look at how great we Hindus were. We knew everything. Our history is the greatest in the world. And our culture is the best culture in the world."
Department No. 2: Victimisation and Self-Pity.
Once you are baptised with pride and arrogance, then you are made into a victim. You get messages which tell you that Hindus have been t0rtured for centuries.
"Look at how we are a victim. These people have not let us succeed for thousands of years. Once you start believing in it, the next to attack is Department #3.
Department No. 3: You are in danger.
"Not only have you been tortured for centuries, but you are still in danger."
Every week, every day, you are showered with false messages.
"Look at this, they will k!ll you inside your homes." "Look at what happened there." "Look at how they killed the sadhus there." "It can happen to you someday."
And who are these people who are after you? They are the people of other religions. And every anti-BJP person are said to be supporting them.
Congress, Aam Aadmi Party, every opposition party, Left-wing, Urban Naxal, George Soros,Pakistan, China, the USA, Russia, all the international agencies are against you.
You are in danger. And when this fear is stuffed inside you, Department #4 will come to save you. Modi's cult of personality.
Department No. 4: Modi's cult of personality
Who will save you? Modi ji will come and save you. Modi ji is our lord and saviour. WhatsApp messages will make you believe that Modi is not a human being.
He is Krishna and Ram incarnate. Right before any election, the third and fourth departments are the most active.
You will get WhatsApp messages. If you want to save Hindus, then you should vote for BJP only.
To create justification, countless false narratives will be created.
So, once again, in short, let's understand the chronology.
Department #1, you are great because you are a Hindu. Department #2, you have been oppressed for centuries. Department #3, you are in danger. And Department 4, Modi and BJP will be the ones to save you.
The emotional roller coaster you are put through, pay attention to how dangerous it is. First the emotion of pride and arrogance, then self-pity, and then hatred and fear.
How Millions of Indians were BRAINWASHED? | The WhatsApp Mafia | Dhruv Rathee
Hash Tag: #Mission100Crore